The Mystery of the Maya priests Review Essay Example

The Mystery of the Maya priests Review Paper Essay on The Mystery of the Maya priests Thanks for the interesting review! Popular scientific literature of this sort really, alas, now almost disappeared. More precisely hit on wheels bubbling stream boom of the so-called served as a mythological, serve-delusional, delusions, mythological, entertainment and business, etc. etc. literature (thats all it means, you can read here). The power of this phenomenon exceeds ten pathetic gusts shovels exercises: without compunction reaching readers not geographically hiding, and quite different grounds. Well, actually remained in the memory of real books that arouse interest in the mysteries of ancient societies. The book, about which I immediately remembered reading a review, it is very close to her subjects Z. Kosidowsky When the sun was a god (two small, but very interesting piece of her is even in electronic form I recommend). Indeed, relations with the history of these books are quite complex: on the one hand a detailed reproduction of the knowledge gained from first-hand th e researchers, on the other the naive attempts to interpret: how they lived there in those of their isms, and how much it differs from ours time. All the time until there was a Soviet historiography about ancient civilizations such societies of ancient Egypt, the Mayan and Aztec refers to either a slave or to feudal. Understand, class struggle had to move the locomotive of history, and all the rebels just create it. Thats why in Kuzmischeva insurgent slaves necessarily struggling with bloody feudal order of priests, priestly rituals the opium of the people, and so on in the same spirit. Personally, I have it is only emotion, and remain forever in the minds of the naive only three forms of social oppression of man:. Slavery, feudalism, capitalism, known since the 19th century. The reality turned out to be both frightening: the study and interpretation of the 20th century discovered a truly amazing scene: dozens of civilization for thousands of years almost spun: come and gone li ke a squirrel in the wheels. 1) Almost all the slaves were a major contingent of residents, and numerous forms of dependence were more varied, and are not so obvious. It was found, for example, that the pyramids were built personally free people and not slaves, as in Kosidowsky. Why should they have to? Elementary: they built their communism, strive for the ideal, but without these light Ideally, it would be no pyramids, no society, no kulutry and we have nothing about them and never learned. 2) The main form of exploitation of man by man was more than a dozen of them, plus the most incredible combination as part of its historical fundamental principle the so-called agropoliatrizma (see, eg, review and references therein.), where large-scale human sacrifices (like Nazism, Stalinism) and the atmosphere of total poralizuyuschego animal terror before them senseless and inevitable is no exception in history, but rather tend to understand that in all its complexity More to come. So it seems that the story they tried all possible options, and its harsh the truth is that the development of each of these societies to stop quickly, inevitably there is the state apparatus parasite literally eats Society: crumbled culture disappeared writing, architecture. But later everything repeated again, with little transference scene. In conclusion, and asks a famous thought: history opened in the 20th century, it still does not only those involved in it. The Mystery of the Maya priests Review Essay Example The Mystery of the Maya priests Review Paper Essay on The Mystery of the Maya priests Thanks for the interesting review! Popular scientific literature of this sort really, alas, now almost disappeared. More precisely hit on wheels bubbling stream boom of the so-called served as a mythological, serve-delusional, delusions, mythological, entertainment and business, etc. etc. literature (thats all it means, you can read here). The power of this phenomenon exceeds ten pathetic gusts shovels exercises: without compunction reaching readers not geographically hiding, and quite different grounds. Well, actually remained in the memory of real books that arouse interest in the mysteries of ancient societies. The book, about which I immediately remembered reading a review, it is very close to her on the subject Z. Kosidowsky When the sun was a god (two small, but very interesting piece of her is even in electronic form I recommend). Indeed, the relationship with the history of these books are quite complex: on the one hand a detailed reproduction of the knowledge gained from first-hand the researchers, on the other very naive almost fantastic level attempts to interpret this knowledge: how they lived in their isms, how much this is different from our time, what a bond between us, a lesson or not have them at all: live and rejoice to the sun. While there was a Soviet (thoroughly ideologized) historiography almost all ancient civilizations like the societies of ancient Egypt, the Mayan and Aztec refers to either a slave or to feudal. Itself class struggle was supposed to serve as a locomotive of history, and all the slaves rebelled directly created it. That in Kuzmischeva insurgent slaves necessarily struggling with bloody feudal order of priests, priestly rituals the opium of the people, and so on in the same spirit. Personally, I have it is only emotion, Yes, but on the other hand, it It remained forever in the naive consciousness of only three forms of social oppression of man:. Slavery, feudalism, capitalism, known since the 19th century. The re ality was much worse like: research and interpretation in the 20th century discovered a truly amazing scene: dozens of civilization for thousands of years almost spun: come and gone like a squirrel in the wheels. 1) Almost all the slaves were a major contingent of residents, and numerous forms of dependence were more varied, and are not so obvious. It is found for example, that the pyramid constructed free and not slaves (as Kosidowsky). Why, why do they need it? Oh God! simple: they built a communism, strive for the ideal! Touches? Yes, but without these light Ideally, it would be no pyramids, no society, no culture, and we are about them nothing and would never have known. It turns out that they were a necessity in the history? 2) The main form of exploitation of man by man was more than a dozen of them, plus the most incredible combination as part of its historical fundamental principle the so-called agropoliatrizma (see, eg, review and references therein.), where large-scal e human sacrifices (like Nazism, Stalinism) and the atmosphere of total poralizuyuschego animal terror before them senseless and inevitable is no exception in history, but rather tend to understand that in all its complexity More to come. So it seems that the story they tried all possible options, and its harsh the truth is that the development of each of these societies to stop quickly, inevitably there is the state apparatus parasite literally eats Society: crumbled culture disappeared writing, architecture. But later everything repeated again, with little transference scene. In conclusion, and asks a famous thought: history opened in the 20th century, it still does not only those involved in it.